Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Guest post by Josh: Marriage replaced by Civil Union?

Two law professors have issued a call to re-examine the role the government plays in marriage. They believe that “the best way out of the intractable legal wars over gay marriage is to take marriage out of the hands of the government altogether", according to Michael Lindenberger's article.

An interesting idea == Keep the term "marriage" as a church term rather than a governmental term. The result of this will be that anybody could be recognized by the government as a family in a "civil union". If they want to make the term that defines their family into the word marriage, all they have to do is go to a church and get married. This takes it out of the hands of the government and keeps it biblical for those for whom this is important.

This proposal makes tremendous sense because it given everyone equal rights to be a family under the law -- and it keeps the "marriage" label on for those for whom this is an important aspect of their religious beliefs.

Everybody should be equal, regardless of their race, gender, religious, or sexual preference. This includes the making of a family, whether it be marriage or otherwise. Everybody should have the right to have a family and be happy. Some people may have the incorrect assumption that gay people don’t make good parents, but I beg to differ.

I happen to have 2 moms and they are extremely good parents. Everybody in my family, my brother, my sister and I each have a good life with my 2 moms. That’s something that should be available to everyone.

Yet for those for whom insist that "marriage" is a term with a biblical definition as the union of a male and a female, they can add this label as part of a religious ceremony, like a bar mitzvah or a first communion. These ceremonies should take place in a church and not be required by the government. This makes it fair and equal for all types of families to come together legally in a "civil union". Why did it take so long for someone to come up with this ingenious idea? It would have saved a lot of grief over Prop 8........

Josh -- high school senior

Labels: ,

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

If Google can take a stand, can't you?

Last Friday afternoon Google took a public stand on California's Proposition 8.
We hope that California voters will vote no on Proposition 8 -- we should not eliminate anyone's fundamental rights, whatever their sexuality, to marry the person they love.

I'm taking that stand with them, how about you?

Labels: , , ,

Recent Entries
 
  • This blog has moved
  • EJ Dionne of the Washingon Post wrote a great colu...
  • President Obama hosted a discussion of health care...
  • Republicans are trying to pin blame for the econom...
  • Wyoming and hate
  • Obama's Q&A with GOP
  • Celebrating one year of President Obama
  • Democrats in Trouble?
  • Republican plan for California
  • Republican Health Care "Plan"

  •  
    Blog Roll
     
  • All California Newspapers
  • Ben's Stem Cell News
  • California Political Daily
  • California Progress Report
  • Calitics
  • Capital Notes
  • Empires Fall
  • KRON: The Bay Area Is Talking
  • Musings From the Margin
  • Pandagon
  • Rough & Tumble
  • Seeing the Forest Blog
  • ShortWoman Blog
  • The Worker Bees Blog

  •   Archives
     
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010

  •  
    Older Blog Posts (Prior to Feb. 2008)
     

    Powered by Blogger

    Subscribe to
    Posts [Atom]